<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another day, another &#8216;independent&#8217; thinktank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/02/another-day-another-independent-thinktank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/02/another-day-another-independent-thinktank/</link>
	<description>Still under development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Penguin</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/02/another-day-another-independent-thinktank/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=96#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I think you miss the point of the article.  A bit old news now but at the time various Tory bloggers were jumping up and down about how the Smith Institute was a Labour front operation while completely ignoring the Policy Exchange and indeed this other so-called independent think tank.
The Point of the article is simply to highlight the hypocrisy of those Tory bloggers and to run through the presumption that there can be such a thing as an independent think tank which of course there aren&#039;t.
Can you please point me in the direction of a senior military person who is an ardent leftie?  I&#039;ll admit the possibility there might be the odd one but perhaps but I think you&#039;ll find them by far in the minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you miss the point of the article.  A bit old news now but at the time various Tory bloggers were jumping up and down about how the Smith Institute was a Labour front operation while completely ignoring the Policy Exchange and indeed this other so-called independent think tank.<br />
The Point of the article is simply to highlight the hypocrisy of those Tory bloggers and to run through the presumption that there can be such a thing as an independent think tank which of course there aren&#8217;t.<br />
Can you please point me in the direction of a senior military person who is an ardent leftie?  I&#8217;ll admit the possibility there might be the odd one but perhaps but I think you&#8217;ll find them by far in the minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dudley Pandocious</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/02/another-day-another-independent-thinktank/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dudley Pandocious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=96#comment-104</guid>
		<description>1. Vernon Bogdanor has been quite public in his support of the Liberal Democratic Party.
2. Prof. Bew (now Lord Bew) was indeed an unofficial advisor to David Trimble for a time, but that was one (of the admittedly many) things the DUP disliked about Trimble. Bew is well-known in N. Ireland for being left-wing and a critic of organisd Unionism, despite coming from a Protestant background.
3. The assumption that just because people have a military background means they are &quot;right wing&quot; is facile.
So the list of supporters is rather more non-partisan than the post is prepared to admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Vernon Bogdanor has been quite public in his support of the Liberal Democratic Party.<br />
2. Prof. Bew (now Lord Bew) was indeed an unofficial advisor to David Trimble for a time, but that was one (of the admittedly many) things the DUP disliked about Trimble. Bew is well-known in N. Ireland for being left-wing and a critic of organisd Unionism, despite coming from a Protestant background.<br />
3. The assumption that just because people have a military background means they are &#8220;right wing&#8221; is facile.<br />
So the list of supporters is rather more non-partisan than the post is prepared to admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrybe</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/02/another-day-another-independent-thinktank/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=96#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, but I will pick you  up on your description of Bogdanor. He was, as you say, Cameron&#039;s tutor, once saying Cameron was &#039; one of the most able students [he] ever taught&#039; (see wikipedia on cameron) but later appearing to changing his mind, particularly criticising cameron&#039;s support for english-vtes-on-english-matters.

now, for the bit I&#039;m trying to recall so don&#039;t qant to be quoted officially on just yet....

he was a conservative cllr in the 1970s/1980s for a bit but left the conservatives for the libdems (I don&#039;t know how officially).
his views are more traditional liberal than they are conservative, and the traditional liberal party is something upon which his work focusses. he is currently writing a book on that period, in fact.

that said, from what I have heard, he is rather willing to, ahem, help out his former students wherever possible and is well-connected in that regard. that said, some of those students went on to be researchers for labour MPs. with a little help from Bogdanor.


hope that fills your description of him out a bit. beep me if you want anything more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, but I will pick you  up on your description of Bogdanor. He was, as you say, Cameron&#8217;s tutor, once saying Cameron was &#8216; one of the most able students [he] ever taught&#8217; (see wikipedia on cameron) but later appearing to changing his mind, particularly criticising cameron&#8217;s support for english-vtes-on-english-matters.</p>
<p>now, for the bit I&#8217;m trying to recall so don&#8217;t qant to be quoted officially on just yet&#8230;.</p>
<p>he was a conservative cllr in the 1970s/1980s for a bit but left the conservatives for the libdems (I don&#8217;t know how officially).<br />
his views are more traditional liberal than they are conservative, and the traditional liberal party is something upon which his work focusses. he is currently writing a book on that period, in fact.</p>
<p>that said, from what I have heard, he is rather willing to, ahem, help out his former students wherever possible and is well-connected in that regard. that said, some of those students went on to be researchers for labour MPs. with a little help from Bogdanor.</p>
<p>hope that fills your description of him out a bit. beep me if you want anything more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

