<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying with Con Air (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/10/flying-with-con-air-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/10/flying-with-con-air-part-2/</link>
	<description>Still under development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/10/flying-with-con-air-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=263#comment-497</guid>
		<description>A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aviationbusinessindex.com/aircraft_details.asp?aircraft=14353&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;small contribution&lt;/a&gt; in the form of a liveried up version of such a plane with Dave-id Cameron smirking at the camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.aviationbusinessindex.com/aircraft_details.asp?aircraft=14353" rel="nofollow">small contribution</a> in the form of a liveried up version of such a plane with Dave-id Cameron smirking at the camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster Blogster</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/10/flying-with-con-air-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster Blogster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=263#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Good sleuthing both Penguin and Westmonster. However, I don&#039;t think we have got all the way to the bottom of this yet. That  is the earliest declared Flying Lion Ltd flight I could find is 19-24 July 2003 for Michael Ancram

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmregmem/040716/memi03.htm

so this has been going on for four years at least.

To follow this up I thought I&#039;d do a Companies House search, and there is no UK Flying Lion Ltd registered, nor has there been. So it would appear that for the at least the last four years, a group of MPs has not been fulfilling their legal obligations under the register of member interests rules. The sanction, as discovered by Westmonster,  is a fine or up to a year in prision.

Of course different rules may have applied in earlier years, but I think I&#039;ll try to go through the registers systematically to see if I can pull out a comprehensive list of those that have benefitted from Flying Lion Ltd&#039;s largesse. The question is who is responsible for shopping them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good sleuthing both Penguin and Westmonster. However, I don&#8217;t think we have got all the way to the bottom of this yet. That  is the earliest declared Flying Lion Ltd flight I could find is 19-24 July 2003 for Michael Ancram</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmregmem/040716/memi03.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmregmem/040716/memi03.htm</a></p>
<p>so this has been going on for four years at least.</p>
<p>To follow this up I thought I&#8217;d do a Companies House search, and there is no UK Flying Lion Ltd registered, nor has there been. So it would appear that for the at least the last four years, a group of MPs has not been fulfilling their legal obligations under the register of member interests rules. The sanction, as discovered by Westmonster,  is a fine or up to a year in prision.</p>
<p>Of course different rules may have applied in earlier years, but I think I&#8217;ll try to go through the registers systematically to see if I can pull out a comprehensive list of those that have benefitted from Flying Lion Ltd&#8217;s largesse. The question is who is responsible for shopping them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalpenguin.org.uk/2007/10/flying-with-con-air-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Westmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=263#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Jesus, that&#039;s good sleuthing! It took me most of yesterday trying to negotiate my way around the Electoral Commission website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, that&#8217;s good sleuthing! It took me most of yesterday trying to negotiate my way around the Electoral Commission website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
