Archive for November, 2008

Do the Tories care about data protection?

I’ve been sitting on this one for quite a while now on the off chance that it might be worth mentioning but as the Daily Mail seems to consider it open season on Labour MP’s I thought it only just and fair to redress the balance a little. Here’s the Daily Mail article that outs Labour MP’s for not registering their offices under Data Protection Act.

So without further ado, here’s a nice little list of all the Tory MP’s that I can’t find any data protection registration for* (Note the asterix for those that are hard of reading, there’s an explanation at the bottom)

1. David Amess
2. Richard Bacon
3. Henry Bellingham
4. Paul Beresford
5. Brian Binley
6. Peter Bone
7. David Burrowes
8. Douglas Carswell
9. Bill Cash
10.Christopher Chope
11.James Clappison
12.Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
13.David Davies (no, not the saviour of liberty, the other one from Monmouth)
14.Philip Davies
15.Nadine Dorries (why am I not surprised)
16.Alan Duncan (Shadow Business)
17.Philip Dunne
18.Michael Fallon
19.Christopher Fraser
20.David Gauke
21.Robert Goodwill
22.Justine Greening
23.John Greenway
24.John Gummer
25.Stephen Hammond
26.Greg Hands
27.David Heathcoat-Amory
28.Nick Herbert (Shadow Justice)
29.Adam Holloway
30.Gerald Howarth
31.John Howell (New boy in Henley should we give him the benefit of the doubt?)
32.Jeremy Hunt (Shadow Culture)
33.Nick Hurd
34.Stewart Jackson
35.Bernard Jenkin
36.David Jones (As promised if any MP’s were registered and dropped me a line I’d say sorry and make an amendment). David has been in touch, he does have a registration (Z9069890) so well done that chap and apologies. It must have been the dates that threw me as the registration only appears to have started in March 2008 despite him being elected in 2005.
37.Edward Leigh
38.Julian Lewis
39.Andrew Mackay
40.Anne McIntosh
41.Andrew Pelling
42.John Penrose
43.Malcolm Rifkind (shocked at this one really)
44.Laurence Robertson
45.Richard Shepherd (Equally shocked given how long he’s been in the chamber)
46.Mark Simmonds
47.Keith Simpson
48.Anthony Steen
49.Andrew Tyrie
50.Ed Vaizey
51.Rob Wilson

I make that 51 Tories that I cannot find any Data Protection Registrationfor,  of which (and lets indulge ourselves in a bit of Daily Mail-esque outrage for fun shall we) shockingly shows the scant regard that the blue boys show for our legislation on data protection with a whopping 26.4% (more than a quarter!) of all Tory MP’s with no sign of a registration.

The Daily Mail also helpfully points us at what happened to the last MP that failed to register, a £200 fine and £500 in costs. So if all those 51 50 Tory MP’s check out then I make that an estimated cost to the Tories of £35,700. The question is, am I prepared to dob them in to the authorities? Well, if the Daily Mail considers it a matter of principle and doing your civic duty to crack down on naughty politicians ignoring the law then as a good citizen I can only do my own duty likewise. Consider a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office as good as sent.

*The disclaimer part. I have extensive knowledge of and longstanding experience of using the ICO’s data protection register. However it is not a perfect system and is highly sensitive and strict to the information queried against it. In the cases where I have found no obvious data I have used wildcards and different configurations of name and title to attempt to find a registration. In the case of those with double-barrel names I have tried both with hyphen, without, the singular of each name with or without the MP title. In the case of some names such as Nick and Rob I have tried variations on what they may be considered to be an abbreviation of such as Nicholas and Robert. In short I’ve tried my best to find a record and these 51 Tory MP’s still draw a blank. If you are one of these MP’s or a representative of them and you possess a valid up to date data registration then as the fair minded person that I am, I am prepared to amend the list. All I will require is the registration number so that I may check it against the national database of which you can supply me with via either the comments section or if you do not wish to appear there, through the dedicated contact page (link at the top of the site).

No Comments »

admin on November 17th 2008 in Tory Bashing

One Laptop per Child – not a chance

I truly hate myself for this as it’s hard to put down what was and still is a very worthy campaign but I’m going to predict that the One Laptop per Child scheme is doomed to failure after it’s European release on November 17th was announced on the BBC.

For those who aren’t aware it was a scheme to produce a laptop for under $100 that could be purchased in the order of millions to provide access to computing to children in the developing world.

It never did get down to the $100 price tag, arrived late, had distribution problems and since then has shifted away from trying to get mass orders from governments to a sort of charitable ‘person from richer country buys two, they keep one and the other is donated’ scheme.

A great idea but it wasn’t particularly successful when they rolled out the scheme in the US and if the BBC article is correct, a price tag of £268 will kill it because to be fair, for that price, it’s crap.

Unless you want a laptop that looks like one of those Leapfrog toddlers learning things with a pitiful 256Mb of RAM, an undisclosed x86 processor, 1Gb of “mass storage” ie a solid state hard drive and a weight of 1.5Kg then it’s not a runner.

The principle was great, if they’d got them to market a couple of years ago as planned then they could have made a killing and would have found a rich seam or Western buyers signing up for what would have been then, a not too bad bit of kit to pick up for the little one here and feel good about donating one to a less well off child in some far flung region of our planet but things are decidedly different now.

£268 will buy you a lot in the current market. Typing this as I am on an MSI Wind (rebadged as an Advent 4211) that cost £280 back in July with an Intel Atom processor 2Gb of Ram (comes with 1Gb, I had it upgraded) an 80Gb hard drive, all the connectivity of a OLPC plus bluetooth and comes in half a kilo lighter (actually it is a bit heavier than the circa 1 kilo that I bought because I have a replacement 6 cell battery that adds a bit more to the weight but it’s still not more than the 1.5Kg weight of a OLPC). You could get these for £250 (£220 from PC World Business briefly) at one stage but PC World/Currys put the price back up. You can get exactly the same model rebadged as a Medion Akoya from Morrisons for £250 with a 160Gb hard drive the other week.

You could get an Acer Aspire One for a lot less or a Celeron based Eee PC 904 for the lower end of £200 or two original Eee PC 701′s for £268 if you shop around which still out-spec the OLPC.

Faced with those real consumer choices no one but a few trendy dinner party liberal types who want to boast about their charitable nature are going to fork out for a OLPC machine.

Sad I know. Personally I wish it were otherwise because the original idea was a very noble one but the market has been overhauled in the last 12 months alone and I just don’t see it working anymore particularly as consumers will be looking for a lot more for their money in the current economic climate.

2 Comments »

admin on November 15th 2008 in Consumerism, Economics, Europe, Techie Stuff

A book review: The Big Earth Book by James Bruges

Every once in a while someone contacts me to review something so tonight folks, it’s book review time. “The Big Earth Book” by James Bruges, published by Sawday’s and printed by Cambridge University Press.

As it name suggests, it is qute big and I really should have penned this review a good three weeks ago but I’ve been busy undertaking (none shelf stacking) duties.

What’s it all about?

Well it covers a vast array of enviromental related topics, heavy on the issues of climate change and owing to recent events ties in elements of global finance, inequality and pretty much the future of our species.

Given it’s wide remit there are areas that I feel are stronger than others reflecting the author’s specialism but across the board it’s challenging in terms of some of the accepted wisdoms and practices of the way we humans go about things.

For me, the core interest despite my background in economics which kicks in later in the book is the first half around enviromental issues. The challenges of negating human detrimental impact on our environment and unlike it seems the current focus of by many writers and the media being around carbon emissions, it deals with the traditional concerns of environmentalists, that of actual pollution and importantly for me the degradation of soil quality across the world.

For me though it’s all very well reading about what are the problems but I’m interested in solutions and despite my trying to keep up with things and finding novel ways that we can negate our impact on the environment the one that stuck out the most for me was in India a scheme that uses wood to produce heat for cooking while also creating charcoal that can be used the enrich the land for growing crops without the use of agro-chemicals which I’d like to look into further.

So on the environmental side the book is strong and full of really interesting ideas but as it moves into the area of global finance there are some contradictions that seem to creep in. The proposition for a global currency against which all others are trading and key resources like oil can be set against instead of an individual countries currency at present like the dollar are classical Keynesian ideas which I’d have a lot of time for. However later it discusses the use of barter instead of currency where people trade their products and skills directly. Although this can and does in places work on a smaller scale it’s not a sensible means by which to run a global economy so I would have to be critical there.

That said there are some other interesting ideas like the Jak Bank in Sweden that works on the principle of not offering interest on saving. A bizarre concept at first for those used to our general model of banking in the West

No Comments »

admin on November 8th 2008 in Economics, Environment, Politics

Harry Beckhough and the German Fourth Reich

Let us get the niceties out of the way before we begin. My parents raised me correctly and in that there was the age old belief that you should respect your elders and old people. Added to that I’m a confirmed believer in the democratic process, would defend it to the hilt and respect that those of past generations fought and indeed in many cases died for the freedoms that I enjoy. So with that in mind, it’s a bit tricky but I’m going to have a serious go at a 94 (might be 92) year old bloke who worked on code-breaking at Bletchley Park during the Second World War.

From the outset I fully recognise that many people can achieve great things in their lives but equally that does not mean that later on they can go seriously off their rocker. From his background I’m presuming that Harry Beckhough worked on German translation at Bletchley Park as opposed to being some kind of mathematical genius but I’m happy to be told otherwise.

The background of this post comes from a post I did recently regarding local UKIPper Derek Bennett having a blog. Derek seems to be a bit on the touchy side and not up for a bit of rib-tickling so no idea how long he’s going to last out here on the old interwebs but he did decide to take me to task. Apparently this blog is run by some ‘Loony Leftie’ a term I’ve never been described as before so I presume I should regard it as some kind of medal of honour. Apparently my blog is full of ‘left wing ideology’ although I’m screwed if I can find any lengthy posts on political theory but there you go, Derek’s obviously off on one having not done his research.

He also seems to be under the delusional opinion that he is qualified to pass judgment on the regularity of my postings for some strange reason. ‘(he doesn’t post as much as this blog)’

Derek Bennett also seems to have a problem with me criticising his endorsement of Germany’s Fourth Reich by Harry Beckbough which we’ll come on to later but he does sign off his post in response to my own signing off with the very complimentary “He signed off with the statement that he had “Important things to do”, I’d like to know what that is – is it stacking shelves in the local supermarket? Get on with it Penguin, Bat Man’s waiting!”

I’ve never quite understood why when criticised even lightly these right-wingers launch head on into full blown personal attacks. I can only presume that it is their lack of intellectual gravitas that means that they can only retort by being insulting and making factually incorrect statements as a means to  undermine those who dare to think differently.

We’ll just address a few of these spurious remarks by Derek Bennett.

My parents taught me that quality is always better than quantity. Perhaps that was because we didn’t have much since Thatcher had destroyed our countries industrial base and my parents jobs along with it but I still hold that belief. I’d rather read/write one good article or post a month than a conveyor belt of garbage but our UKIPper Mr Bennett seems to believe that quantity is what counts so I think we’re not going to see a meeting of minds on that one.

No Derek, I’m self-employed and none of my work involves the stacking of shelves I’m afraid although it’s nice to see to what lowly regard he holds people who undertake such jobs, I do wonder if he expresses these views to the staff at his local supermarket. In addition to this I am a devoted father of two young children and also have other work to attend to so I’m sorry if he seems to think he has a right to question me but he sadly doesn’t.

Right, now for the fun stuff. Harry Beckbough and the German Fourth Reich. I’ll be the first to admit that I hadn’t read it. The headline assumption that this book/publication/knocked up on Microsoft Word thing, whatever it was, is a complete load of tosh because it appeared to suggest that the EU (that thing that for some reason Derek Bennett has a real problem with) was some kind of German conspiracy to take over Europe.

Derek says:

“Political Penguin also found the booklet, Germany’s Fourth Reich written and produced by Harry Beckhough, funny. He tried to ridicule, without understanding, what Harry Beckhough is explaining. Harry is a knowledgeable man who was a code breaker during the last war – he is not the sort of person who is going to write unintelligible drivel as Political Penguin does.”

So me being the curious little Penguin that I am, decided to take up Derek’s suggestion and get me either a synopsis or a copy. Now I wasn’t going to waste a fiver on it so I decided to see if it was knocking around online and hey presto I get this published on the English Democratic Party’s website. (never heard of this lot before but they’re funny too although their website is crap).

Forgive me if anyone thinks I’m taking quotations out of context but I’m going to hazard a guess that this Harry Beckbough guy really doesn’t like Germans, or Russians for that matter. Here’s two extracts from the introduction so you can decide for yourself:

“Added to my own research into the eternally aggressive intent of the German mindset, lust after power and domination of all Europe, East and West, and beyond, from the Atlantic to the Urals. A way of thinking, planning, plotting and lying deception, foreign to the British way of life, and unthinkable to our trusting nature.”

and,

“(our trusting West is just not brought up to pierce and dissect the wholesale lies and cunning deceit, of which both Russians and Germans are so adept).”

I did persist and read through the whole piece which follows on subsequent pages and the upshot is that Harry reckons the EU is a massive conspiracy whereby somehow Nazi’s at the end of World War Two hid themselves away with lots of money and then went about buying up lots of businesses to take over the world and as proof of this among other corporate goings on, he cites the purchase of the US firm Pimco Advisors Holdings by the Allianz Group for $33million. Apart from that should have been $3.3Billion so forgive me if I’m not going to trust my outlook on the world to some geezer that can’t differentiate between these two rather obviously different sums of cash apart from the proposition that the EU is some massive German world domination conspiracy not being barking enough.

Now I’ll add that after reading the publication on the English whatever Party’s website I thought it was awful in terms of structure and grammar so I decided to look elsewhere and came up with what looks like a full version of the document in Word format from here.

Just before we move on though, just a note and folks, no we really couldn’t make this stuff up if we tried. The English Democratic Party’s website along with all this anti-German rhetoric has it’s webserver based in guess where? Yup, Germany, indeed, very patriotic of them and oh so ironic.

I digress. So I got hold of this longer version from these silentmajority.co.uk people and just so we know the quality of discourse we’re dealing with here then here’s the main quote from the header section of their website:

“We are the Silent Majority, that’s you, me and us. Luckily there are billions of us. However there is a minority of seriously psychopathic people that run our lives. This Global Crime Syndicate have been busy for many years and your life, family, and friends is of little concern. Backed up by their Nazi freak scientists they plan to destroy most of us. If you find yourself working for this Evil leave now or throw a seriously large spanner in the works. We are now under serious attack and it is now becoming obvious to even those who would have never even dreamt it in their worst nightmares.”

Dear dear folks, we really are in wingnut territory tonight.

However and I’m happy to be instructed to the contrary but this seems to be the full on long version of The German Fourth Reich which has the rather illuminating sub-title of “Origins and Development seeking World Domination in ruthless terror”. Got to watch these German’s they’re evil, the lot of them I tell ya.

While I was hunting out these documents I also just happened across a little video as well (not really that little, at 50 minutes long). Won’t bother embedding it but here’s the link. It’s a sort of cosy chat come interview with our very own Harry Beckbough which I listened to while trying to absorb his written works.

Particularly of interest was the bit about the ‘illuminati’. Those versed in their conspiracy theory background will know this group. Big secret society, controls the world etc etc along with the Jews, the Davinci Code mob and the Lizard people, we get the picture, Harry’s a conspiraloon.

So to sign off on Harry Beckbough, 1940′s, good guy doing his bit to fight for freedom and democracy against Naziism, 60 years later, sadly gone a bit bonkers on the conspiracy theory stuff and is being used by others to peddle and back up their own agenda.

Back on to Derek Bennett for a last thought. Derek’s endorsing this rubbish so the question is, does Derek believe that German’s and Russian’s are a bunch of plotting, lying, deceiving people purely on the basis of their nationality and presumably by implication that Brits aren’t because I’ve met some right nasty lying deceiving ones in my time? I look forward to seeing that in his next election address.

I am just wondering if all these fleets into the conspiraloon territory might explain why Derek seems to have been sidelined by UKIP in recent years, perhaps he’s even too nutty for them, and that takes some beating.

Tata for now, I’m off to do some work, and no, not stacking shelves either. Good night.

2 Comments »

admin on November 3rd 2008 in Europe, Politics

Lewis Hamilton F1 Drivers World Champion 2008

We waited, we were patient. All us long suffering British F1 fans but once again we’ve got a champion.

It’s been incredibly amusing the last few months reading articles in the media doing the good lad down but he delivered in the end although leaving it till the last corner-ish, of the last lap of the last race of the season is probably pushing it a bit.

Yes it was a tense race and two laps from the end Mrs Penguin did have some choice words for Sebastian Vettel but it all turned out alright in the end, although next season can we win it a bit earlier on please?

So the Penguin household is a happy one tonight. Lewis has won the Driver’s Championship although as a confirmed McLaren fans it’s a pity we don’t have the constructor’s title either but nevermind, we haven’t had a McLaren driver win the title since Mika Häkkinen in 1999.

Norberg Haug, boss of the Mercedes Racing Division was looking especially pleased I noticed. Think I also spotted a couple of tears from Ron Dennis as well.

So failing the FIA finding any reason to disqualify or penalise him we’re very proud of Lewis here and unlike some detractors in the press, never doubted his ability to bring it home.

No Comments »

admin on November 2nd 2008 in Formula 1