I had a hard time coming up with the title for this post. So many different angles ran through my mind as to how to approach this issue however I’ve settled on a simple list of facts with additional extended explanations for the hard of reading.
Here’s how it started:
Labour Blogger, that’s me, Political Penguin to most people, Gareth Williams to others wrote this post. In it I said exactly these words (note, unlike some bloggers I do not retro-edit my posts, delete or amend them to get me out of trouble, I stand by what I say). Also note that it contains a little bit of swearing which I do on the whole tend not to do on my blog but I thought it justified.
“This is for the miserable little Prick from Prague in the Czech Republic who yesterday had a bash at trying to crack my site. Yes I do know who you are so piss off and don’t come back.”
So there we go. Some miserable little so-and-so from Prague in the Czech Republic had a go at cracking my site. For future reference please note two things. Firstly they ‘had a bash at trying’ they did not succeed and at no point in the post do I name anyone specifically.
Then a few comments come in from Dave Hartley in which he states ‘Dominic can’t help it’ which one could assume that he believed that the culprit behind the attempted cracking was Dominic Fisher, well known Tory blogger who resides in Prague.
You will also note that my response to David Hartley is ‘Don’t be presumptuous Dave’. Now unless I’m mistaken I told Dave to not to be unduly confident in his assumption that the person who attempted to crack my site was Dominic Fisher and just so we absolutely get everything clear, yes I do know who it was, yes they are located in Prague in the Czech Republic and NO it was not Dominic Fisher aka Prattory.
By his own admission Dominic is a technical idiot not interested in computers, IT, gadgets and the like and I have no reason to doubt his word on that. The person who attempted to crack my site had some hacking knowledge but was by no means an expert as they failed miserably.
Now as far as I was concerned that was that. The expression of some annoyance as to someone wanting to try such a thing, end of matter.
Then I came home today to find this comment from that thread waiting for me in moderation (contains explicit language):
Rory Says:
October 9th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
“Its not hard to hack a shitty blog like this when you use free third party software to run it. You cheap fuck.”
To say I was a little taken aback is to put it mildly. I’ve had a few people try to play silly buggers with me on my site but this is the first outright openly hostile comment I’ve received in almost a year of blogging.
Being the curious person that I was, I had to see who and where this person came from.
This is him:
Author : Rory (IP: 88.146.60.193 , a40-prg1-11-193.static.adsl.vol.cz)
E-mail : rawtothecore@hotmail.com
Now the ‘.cz’ bit really interested me. I’d thought for some reason that I might have offended someone in Prague and they’d taken it personally which would never be my intention to slur an entire nation or city’s populace so I had a little look at my analytics for the site and something struck me, well two things to be precise.
Firstly, there was no referrer. Most people end up at my site by way of Google. It far outranks all my other referrals but nothing for how this person got to the site. OK, there’s a couple of options, Rory could be using referral blocking but why would he do that? He could have simply typed in my URL by accident and came across something he didn’t like or perhaps have received the link on an e-mail or had been told to key in the URL.
Now on to the second thing. Rory dropped by at 15.12 on October 9th to leave his little comment. Strangely enough though, and as you can imagine I don’t tend to get inundated with readers from the Czech Republic, there was another IP address (80.250.1.180) from the Czech Republic that had visited the site at 14.58. Now for those who have not had the pleasure of a visit from dear Dominic Fisher, that is his main IP address. He uses a few others from time to time but when he’s knocking about the blogs, that’s the one he’s usually on. So was it him? Well, there is no proof apart from he happened to be around at Tom Watson’s site an hour prior to then dropping his usual insightful comments.
Of course, could be just a coincidence as is that Dominic runs Windows XP on his computer and uses Internet Explorer 6. Note to Dominic, dude, if you’re really going to use such a rubbish browser then do yourself a favour and upgrade to IE7, 6 is so full of holes and I’d hate to think you’d get a virus or something on your computer.
Then of course these same two IP addresses drop back later in the day presumably to see if I’ve responded to Rory’s lovely comment while monitoring using Bloglines (which incidentally is what Prattory uses).
OK, that’s the conspiracy theory side of things which is where we get to an interesting twist. I’d hazard a guess that if me and Dominic ever met up, we probably wouldn’t agree on much but there is one thing, neither of us subscribe to conspiracy theories as he outlines here.
Incidentally, I’m curious, is this Dominic’s new blog? Has he picked up the keyboard in anger again? I’m sure I remember him saying he was going to stop, I think we should be told.
So here we are, two rather cynical old sods who don’t subscribe to conspiracy theories apart from one thing. Who’s this RAW guy commenting on the post? Here’s what he had to say:
RAW said…
“Gareth Williams seems like a right nutter. The old ‘he tried to hack my site’ routine is so dumb its so Labour. Not that I support any UK political party, in fact one reason why I left that country was partly due to the politics. I tried to leave a comment on his blog about this issue but he seems not to be open to the concepts of free speech and censored my comment. Typical New Labour for you.”
Now that’s strange but first let’s just have a little laugh. Apparently I seem like a right nutter which is nice to know. Why is it that people who suddenly start to criticise Labour preempt their argument by saying something like ‘I’m not political but’ or ‘I’m not a member of a party but’? Nevermind, lets get down to the two really funny bits.
I’m not quite sure that the ‘he tried to hack my site’ routine is much of an oldie nor indeed ’so Labour’. Happy to be proved wrong on this one but the only recent recollection I have of someone in UK politics claiming they’d been hacked was Grant Shapps who during the Ealing Southall by-election claimed to have had his YouTube account hacked. Note to Rory/RAW, he’s a Tory and obviously an idiot if his password was 1234. So there we go, an inability to qualify a statement with any actual evidence seems to be the order of the day but lets move on to his allegation that I ‘censored’ his comment.
Well, it’s there and completely unaltered from what he wrote as offensive as it is. I was aware of the comment earlier in the day but decided to mull on the idea of releasing it primarily for two reasons. Firstly I did state way back in the first post I ever wrote for this blog a rudimentary terms of use:
“Terms of use are simple, you are free to post anything that you want as long as it is not offensive for the purpose of purely causing offence. I welcome well thought-through comments even if you fundamentally disagree with my views and I’m happy to discuss with you. Political point scoring designed to boost the ego of the comment’s author will be treated with the respect for which it deserves and be ignored.”
I would have normally put this particular comment into the category of causing offense purely for causing offense and deleted it but as it forms a thread of these events then I finally, after doing much more important (sorry but in the scale of things, my family and other duties come a lot higher in my list of priorities than OK’ing comments by offensive people like Rory/RAW) things.
There’s two things that are strange here. Firstly Rory/RAW as it is the same person (I’m sure Liverpool misses him madly now he’s left the country) has sought to criticise me for censoring his comment. That’s strange because looking at the page on Prattory’s new site there’s the little giveaway that RAW’s previous comment has been removed by the author yet for some strange reason he doesn’t claim that it is a typical Tory anti-freedom of speech action, very strange that, could almost make you think their mates or something.
I’m just going to flit back to Rory/RAWS original comment on my site, the offensive one.
Rory Says:
October 9th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
“Its not hard to hack a shitty blog like this when you use free third party software to run it. You cheap fuck.”
OK, yes, everything used on my site to build it is free and Open Source with the exception of the odd embedded YouTube clip which is Flash. That would be because I work using Free Open Source Software (FOSS). Partly for practicality (it is a superior development methodology) and partly ideologically that I believe openness and sharing is preferable to closed proprietary systems.
However for some strange reason he doesn’t seem to level the same criticism at Dominic, after all he’s using free software as is virtually every blogger out there. Whether it be Wordpress, Blogger.com, B2Evolution, Movable Type, it’s all free so what’s the criticism here about? (note, there is actually a commercial as well as a free version of Movable Type). I would give Rory/RAW a little history lesson in where half the software on his Mac running Safari comes from but I fear it would go over his head.
Final bit about that comment. Rory/RAW says it’s not hard to hack my ’shitty little blog’ so here we go. If it’s not hard, go on, I dare you to. I’ve place a small bit of coding deep inside my site that describes something about Prague. Find it and you get not only the pleasure of proving me wrong and elevating yourself to the status whereby I might respect your techie ability, I’ll even buy you a pint the next time you’re in the UK. Deal? Just one thing though, just to make sure you don’t cheat and get a much cleverer mate to do it for you, you’ve got to do it from the same IP address that you made the comment from OK?
Now on to Dominic. I’ve been quite fair so far and I’m more inclined to simply pose a few questions. Dominic wasn’t the person trying to hack my site unless he’s got a really clever mate to do it for him but I don’t think that likely, there is no real motive and as much as I don’t care for him and he probably feels the same about me I would hazard a guess he wouldn’t be bothered to go to those kind of lengths.
What does bother me though is that he read the article and immediately took it to mean that I meant him. I know he went to school during the time the Tories were in power but so did I and I did manage to gain the ability to read and understand things. Whether he has jumped to a conclusion or is simply paranoid I have no idea but he has, true to form played the victim of which there is no accusation to start with and his reference to an adherent to the theory was in fact someone assuming something that wasn’t true and me putting them straight on the matter.
Yes, this is politics, Dominic’s tried in the past to misrepresent what I’ve said and yes, he’s got form for using sock puppets, retro-comment moderation, retro-editing, deleting posts that might prove embarrassing and the like but why he has seen fit to accuse me of accusing him of something when I firstly said no such thing and secondly when someone else jumped to the wrong conclusion I put them straight, I have no idea.
If it were anyone else I’d ask for an apology or a correction in light of the facts but somehow I doubt I’d get one. What also surprises me is that assuming Dominic picked up on this story early on the 9th of October and thought I meant him then instead of what looks like putting his mate up to knocking out an offensive comment, he didn’t just simply contact me. I’m a very reasonable person, there’s a contact section on the site, it’s only a few clicks away. If he had some problem with the post or took it the wrong way then instead of going down the sock puppet and play the victim approach, if he was mature enough he could just have said ‘I think some people might think you mean me by that post can you change it?’ and I’d have said yes and at his request put in a specific disclaimer that it definitely wasn’t Dominic Fisher who attempted to hack my site but he didn’t.
So there you go, you’ve got a long list of the events of what is now yesterday. I won’t propose any ideas for fear of being labeled a conspiracy theory nutcase by people who don’t know me, you can make up your own mind whether you think there’s anything going on. My own personal belief is that Dominic instead of doing the mature thing and simply contact me has concocted a ham-fisted attempt and sock puppetry which is so blatantly obvious it’s laughable.
Final note to Dominic. Change the timestamps on your new blog, they’re running on US time and it makes it look like Rory/RAW is complaining I censored his comment before he even posted it. Oh, and a thank you. As it seems that some people believe I should respond to them instantly I’ll finally get round to doing a proper site policy section so everyone knows where they stand in future and certain people don’t get upset and jump up and down.
[Update] Dom has obviously finally noticed that he got my name wrong and in true Prattory style has retro-edited his post so as not to look like a twonk. Note to Dom, it’s good blogging practice to put a note at the end of your post highlighting any changes, never mind, wouldn’t expect anything more.